Occidental Israeli Rotating Header Image

‍‍ אלול תשסח / תשרי תשסט - September, 2008:

In Support of Israeli Independence

Ha’aretz (online) reported today is that the IDF has decided to forgo buying American made cluster bombs and rely instead on Israeli Military Industries (IMI – also commonly referred to as Ta’as) for future purchases. According to the article, two years ago, during the Second Lebanon War, when Israel relied heavily on American made bombs, “between 30 percent and 40 percent of the bombs failed to explode on impact”. In addition to the obvious operational drawback to weapon that is effective only just over half of the times, unexploded cluter bombs have remained all over southern Lebanon have contituted a pretty significant risk to civilians in the area, and have even caused more than a few deaths after the end of the war. IMI, on the other hand, claims that its cluster bombs have a less than 1 percent rate of unexploded bombs.

Apart from these advantages, this is also a positive move on Israel’s part because it is relying on local industry for the state’s needs. Free trade notwithstanding, Israel purchases most of its weapons from the U.S using the extensive financial suport Israel receives in the form of military aid. Israel also receieves a few billion dollars every year as economic foreign aid.

While a nice gesture on America’s side, from an Israeli standpoint this is bad. Very bad. There was once a time Israel’s future was insecure and much of that was due to economic instability. That time is no more. By accepting foreign funds it has become, de facto, a patron state and is constantly beholden to the U.S. Israel cannot make foreign policy decisions, trade agreements or even determine its own domestic policy without requesting permission from the rich uncle on the other side of the ocean.

Also today, Ha’aretz reported that the U.S has approved the sale of 25 F-35 stealth fighter jets to Israel. From a military standpoint, I’m sure the top brass in Israel thinks this is great news. They are the experts, and in the short-term, they are probably right. However, if Israel were not reliant on America, and did not spend 75% of its aid in the United States, it would be forced to come up with solutions of its own. This is not to say that the U.S.-Israel relationship is of no use, or that it should be weakened. It should, however, be a relationship of equals. Not a patron-client relationship.

The Israeli economy is strong enough today to survive on its own. American aid to Israel needs to end now. A truly independent Israel would develop its own military technology and would not be reliant on the permission of foreign bodies to purchase items it deems necessary for its defense. It would develop them on its own. Israel has, after all, developed a superior tank, the tank. If actually forced to, Israel would be able to come up with a superior fighter jet as well. We are no longer in the era of the Lavi.

With a 21-year low employment rate of 6.1%, the 2007 inflation at 3.4% and the Shekel constantly strengthening against the US Dollar (even lately, when the Dollar has been doing better agains the Euro and the British Pound), Israel’s economy is not the flailing economy of a fledgling state any longer. If given the opportunity, we would be able to supply our military ourselves and make policy decisions without hypocritical American threats.

Traditionally, what happens on Rosh HaShana is a sign of what will happen throughout the coming year. Nevertheless, I hope this year does not follow this trend, and true Israeli independence will finally be a reality.

Sarah Palin is Just Too Dumb

John McCain’s running mate, first considered a stupid choice, then a brilliant move, is now proving herself to be a rather unintelligent choice. Unless he’s going for the stupid vote. I have to say I am not endorsing Obama at all, I think his views foreign policy are wrong and potentially harmful to anyone who doesn’t want Bin Laden or Ahmadinejad controlling things in the world.

However Sarah Palin, over and over again, has proven herself to be woefully inadequate to serve in any position that has anything to do with international affairs. Her extensive experience in fictitious trade missions to Russia, her newly obtained passport are just two examples as to why the average business traveler is probably better suited for meeting a foreign dignitary then the Governor of Alaska.

Much has been written after Katie Couric interviewed Palin recently, how the idea of Sarah Palin having any real power is a pretty scary idea. Jeffrey Goldberg in the Atlantic, however, brings up a less known part of the interview in which, as he says, she basically endorses Hamas.

On the topic of exporting democracy worldwide, the Republican choice for second in command of the free world had some very odd comments. Couric asked her what “if the goal of democracy doesn’t produce the desired outcome? In Gaza, the U.S. pushed hard for elections and Hamas won.”  Palin, showing a new level of stupidity, made Jon Stewart very happy by saying: “Yeah, well especially in that region, though, we have to protect those who do seek democracy.”

What sort of idiot is she? Has she not ever watched any news that had to do with anything outside of Alaska and Putin rearing his head into Alaska’s airspace…? She just unknowingly defended Hamas’ control of the Palestinian Authority. The key word here is unknowingly. If she had meant to show her support for Hamas on national television then fine. Wrong, but fine. But she didn’t – She is stupid. It’s painful to watch.

Someone get this fool out of here. Fast.

Shana Tova

May this be a happy, peaceful year, ktivah v’chatimah tovah to all.

לשנה הבאה בירושלים

Public Opinion Decides Outcomes of Ongoing Conflicts

The BBC decided it was a good idea to poll international public opinion to see who is winning “”the conflict between al-Qaeda and the US”, finding that 49% think neither side is winning, 22% believe the US has the upper hand and 10% say al-Qaeda is winning.

Since when does public opinion determine the outcomes of wars? The BBC even went so far as to say that the “verdict across the world appeared to be that the war on terror had produced something of a stalemate.” Verdict? Really? Judge and Jury to decide who wins a war?

Internationally, only 22% said US action had weakened al-Qaeda, while 34% of Americans thought it had. I’m curious to how many of these people actually know who is winning or only offering their opinion on the matter.

I think Bin Laden rigged the jury.

I think Bin Laden rigged the jury.

Things I Miss About Israel

When I talk to an Israeli for five minutes we know more about each other, and get closer than I would to an American after a month.

אם אשכחך ירושלים, תשכח ימיני

Tom Segev v. The Truth

Noah Pollack is right in his criticism of Tom Segev as a “scholar” who writes as a “revisionist” not as a historian but as someone who wants to “see politics triumph over scholarship”. However, in response to Segev’s review of “Icon of Evil,” saying that it “is of little scholarly value, and may be potentially harmful to Middle East peace prospects”, Pollack makes a point, that I think is extremely unuseful: “What in fact has been very harmful to the peace process is the New Historians themselves.”

I am not saying he is mistaken. But it is entirely irrelevant. A historian should not be thinking of the consequences of his writing in his books. He should strive to uncover the truth, the whole truth and make it publicly known. Not try and figure out what is harmful to the peace process. By saying this, Segev belies his own medicority as an academic.

But Segev is more than just mediocre. He is a danger and harmful to all those seek the truth.

Tom Segev has long been a despicable figure in the arena of Israeli history and the history Arab-Israeli relations, changing historical facts to match his own distorted view of the situation. How one can describe the British as pro-Zionist during the period of the mandate is beyond me. Are these the same British, whose police did nothing to stop the Hebron Massacre of 1929? The same British who basically banned Jewish immigration to what was then known as Palestine? The same British who, in breach of the mandate, whose purpose was “putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917″ (The Balfour Declaration) gave away over 70% of the mandate territory to the Hashemite family? How very Zionist of them.

Segev claims, regarding the Six Day War, that “the war with Egypt was inevitable because the Israeli society was so weak…[that] Israel was simply too weak not to start the war with Egypt.” That’s right. Closing the Straits of Tiran was not an act of war. Nasser’s declarations about “how to totally exterminate the State of Israel for all time” were a moderating influence. As Michael Oren has pointed out, in his wonderful review of Segev’s latest piece of drivel, Segev simply chooses to ignore any “Arab calls for Israel’s destruction and the slaughter of its citizens”. It would undermind his point that Israel is bad, and wouldn’t let him modify history to fit his opinions, never mind what actually happened.

When publications like the New York Times publish such garbage, they are doing more than just harm their own reputation, and possibly the good name of the authors of “Icon of Evil”, for “he who controls the past, controls the future,” and if the past is not controlled by those who tell the truth, what will the future look like?

Jon Stewart’s Intelligence

…or lack thereof.

Okay, he’s not that stupid, really, but he is so self righteous that when he tries to be proves how smart he is and it turns out that he’s wrong, well, you almost just have to say something.

A couple weeks ago the aforementioned foreign affairs expert interviewed Tony Blair, and Stewart tried to criticize the idea that democracies don’t go to war with each other (this is known as Democratic Peace Theory) as a fabricated theory, made up by the cabal of neocons, basically as an excuse to invade Iraq.

James Kirchick, over at Commentary’s blog has a great analysis of the interview and Jon Stewart, which is especially important considering the poll Kirchick mentions, which finds that “For Americans under 30, these comedy shows [e.g. The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, LB]are now mentioned almost as frequently as newspapers and evening network news programs as regular sources for election news.”

After Tony Blair disproves Stewart attempt at disproving an international relations theory, Stewart goes on to say that “Hamas and Hezbollah aren’t like Al Qaeda, and could not share that group’s goals, because the two Palestinian terrorist organizations are “localized,” whereas Al Qaeda has broader ambitions.” I would say that he completely ignores history, but he doesn’t, because he doesn’t really know history. He has a very narrow view of history, which he views in an orthodox “progressive” lens. Hezballah has hijacked a TWA plane, bombed American marines in Beirut, and is responsible many more humanitarian acts.

Trying to differentiate Hamas from Al Qaeda is also pretty stupid, considering one group helps fund the other (see: Karine A).

Not the latest thing online, but go read.

Freedom

This is a little old – from 9 months ago, but here it is:

This is it. I’m finally free. A few days ago I handed in my military ID was given my discharge certificate and a reservist ID. So I’m not entirely free, not for the next 15 years, but more freedom is better than less.

On the way to the bakum on that fateful Tuesday I was surprised yet again at how low bureaucracy can stoop. I got on a bus and presented the driver with my ID and a card saying that on that day I was allowed to use public transportation for free, while still wearing civilian clothing. He told me to turn it around and I saw that trains and Dan buses (city buses for the Tel Aviv area) were excluded. Somebody please explain to me how I was supposed to get to the bakum without Dan buses. No appreciation – the State does anything to save a buck – and by that point I couldn’t do anything about it, and I just wanted to be done with the whole thing already.

The driver was nice enough to let me ride for free anyway.

Freedom, by the way, isn’t always all it’s cracked up to be. But it’s still good to be free. I would, and will do it again – getting those brown envelopes with the triangles on them in the mail gives you an odd sensation that is a mix of duty and doom that you just don’t get from anything else.

The Settlers are Evil!

This is what the New York Times is reporting, while basically accusing people of attempted murder with no hard evidence whatsoever. Isabel Kershner, proving she either has no journalistic integrity to speak of, or a weak mental capacity (or both), describes Prof. Sternhell, the victim of a pipebomb attack at his home, as having made “impassioned critiques of Jewish settlements in the West Bank”. Legitimizing murder is an “impassioned critique”?

Also, what is this headline – “Radical Settlers Take on Israel“? The New York Times regularly reports on the latest Peace Now report accusing a large section of Israeli society of land theft (by manipulating Civil Administration data and maps and then claiming them as a source). I’ve never seen a headline about “Extremist Leftist Movement Takes on Israel”. They are basically characterizing “settlers” as anti-Israel. Every time they write like this they stray farther and farther away from journalism and into the land of (amateurish) punditry.

What I think is almost funny though, Sternhell ascribes so much importance to himself, that he has declared this attack to be the beginning of the end of democracy in Israel.

And I thought jailing minors for nothing was a pretty good sign of democracy’s demise, or maybe a lack of freedom of expression would be undemocratic.

This, by the way, is what is happening while settlers are busy practicing witchcraft – freedom of worship is not granted by the protégés of Israel’s premier expert of the demise of democracies. Freedom of assault is clearly a well-known tenet of democracy.

Kissinger is suddenly good?

Apparently Henry Kissinger is unhappy with Obama’s mischaracterization of his views, insisting that he “would not recommend…talks with Iran at the Presidential level.” Good to hear, since meeting with Ahmadinajad is something only stupid people do.

What confuses me is that Kissinger is considered such an important authority on foreign affairs… by the Democratic nominee. Kissinger has long been criticized by the anti-War left for playing such a substantial role in the Vietnam War, as Nixon‘s National Security Advisor and later, as Secretary of State. So why is Obama deferring to (what he thought was) Kissinger on foreign affairs?

What makes this even more confusing is Obama’s struggle with attracting Jewish voters. A recent poll showed that Obama leads with 57% to McCain’s 30%, which is the lowest lead a Democratic candidate has enjoyed among American Jews in decades. Kissinger was opposed to the airlift to Israel during the Yom Kippur War, preferring instead to side with anti-Semitic murderers of Jews.

Then again, an earlier poll showed that only 48% of Jews under the age of 35 would consider Israel’s destruction to be a “personal tragedy”, and only 54% are even “comfortable with the idea of a Jewish State”.

In other words, in order to campaign for the presidency, it is no longer important be in favor of anything that would actually be good for the Jewish people because the future of American Jewry is, by and large, stupid.