I actually do think that Birthright has had a lot of positive consequences. While I am not aware of any studies on the topic, I do believe that the increase in North American aliyah is, at least somewhat, a result of Birthright. Many aspects of the program, however, remain unexamined. These include the value of such a massive investment of Jewish communal funds, and the marginal return on this incredible expense (costing the Israeli taxpayer, as well).
Talking:Loud::Saying Nothing raises a lot of these questions, and suggests how these vast sums of money might be better directed. Unfortunately, I do not see anything changing anytime soon, because Talking Loud’s proposal would, in effect, leave the diasporic Jewish organizations and leaders, community-less.
I tend to believe that Birthright is useful and that it does help to build a connection between participants and Israel.
Absolutely – I do, too. In the grand scheme of things I think Birthright has been an overwhelmingly positive influence within the Jewish community. Nevertheless, there does seem to be minimal oversight – many of these trips are overseas college parties on wheels. Also, there is much to be said for the argument that actually teaching Hebrew (to the level of fluency) would go a long way for the Israel-Diaspora Jewish relationship.